Paul Offit on How We Could Lose the Modern Medical Marvel of Vaccines

Dr. Paul Offit has written an admirably clear account of why a legal case could mean the end of the modern medical marvel of vaccines (try BugMeNot if you need a log-in for the full article).
No single medical advance has had a greater impact on human health than vaccines. Before vaccines, Americans could expect that every year measles would infect four million children and kill 3,000; diphtheria would kill 15,000 people, mostly teenagers; rubella (German measles) would cause 20,000 babies to be born blind, deaf, or mentally retarded; pertussis would kill 8,000 children, most of whom were less than one year old; and polio would paralyze 15,000 children and kill 1,000.Offit provides an overview of the consequences of a scare about pertussis vaccines in the UK in the 1970s.
Because of vaccines all of these diseases have been completely or virtually eliminated from the United States. Smallpox -- a disease estimated to have killed 500 million people -- was eradicated from the face of the earth by vaccines. And we're not finished; vaccines stand as our only chance to prevent pandemic influenza, AIDS, and bioterror, and our best chance to prevent certain cancers.
Now, massive litigation could force companies to leave the vaccine business, threatening the future of one of medicine's greatest achievements. On June 11, in an unprecedented action before a federal claims court, lawyers for 4,800 autistic children will argue that vaccines caused autism. If successful, these claims could exhaust the pool of money currently set aside to compensate children who have been hurt by vaccines. Further, lawyers will likely take their claims that vaccines cause autism to civil court, where awards could be enormous.
The British media hailed Wilson's report as fact and the percentage of children immunized dropped from 80 to 30. During the next few years, 300,000 children in England were hospitalized and 70 killed by pertussis.The disincentives for remaining in the business of vaccine production were so strong that the US Government introduced the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986. The Act was intended to deal with and compensate cases where children had been injured by vaccines, and to disallow those speculative claims for harm for which there was no epidemiological support (e.g., the purported connection between the vaccine for hepatitis B and Multiple Sclerosis). Despite the provisions of this Act, the potential profits did not justify the risk exposure. At the start of the 1980s, 18 companies made vaccines; by the close of the 1980s, only 4 were still producing vaccines.
By the late 1970s fears of pertussis vaccine had spread to the United States. Before jurors persuaded more by emotional appeals than by science, lawyers successfully claimed that the pertussis vaccine caused sudden infant death syndrome (later found to be associated with sleep position), Reye's syndrome (later found to be associated with aspirin), unexplained coma, paralysis, mental retardation, and epilepsy.
Seven companies stopped making the vaccine; within a few years only one, Lederle Laboratories, remained. Lederle was punished for its persistence. In 1986 a jury awarded $1.13 million to parents claiming that Lederle's pertussis vaccine had paralyzed their son -- an award that was more than half of the annual sales of the vaccine. Subsequent studies of hundreds of thousands of children showed that the risk of permanent brain damage was the same in children who had not received the vaccine as in those who had. [My emphases.]
Since that time, both in the UK and the US, there have been periodic shortages of vaccines: these have had consequences for the young, the elderly and those with compromised immune systems.
In the US, the companies that produce vaccines are about to find themselves in the dock, again.
Lawyers will argue that either the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine or a mercury-containing preservative (thimerosal) in vaccines or the combination of the two can cause autism. This theory has been advanced on television shows such as 60 Minutes, in popular magazines like Time and Newsweek, and on national radio programs such as Imus in the Morning...I hope that Offit's jeremiad doesn't come true. If it were to come true, then truly we might be facing the prospect of the first generation of children to die before their parents.
Certainly there is plenty of evidence to refute the notion that vaccines cause autism. Fourteen epidemiological studies have shown that the risk of autism is the same whether children received the MMR vaccine or not, and five have shown that thimerosal-containing vaccines also do not cause autism. Further, although large quantities of mercury are clearly toxic to the brain, autism isn't a consequence of mercury poisoning; large, single-source mercury exposures in Minamata Bay and Iraq have caused seizures, mental retardation, and speech delay, but not autism.
Finally, vaccine makers removed thimerosal from vaccines routinely given to young infants about six years ago; if thimerosal were a cause, the incidence of autism should have declined. Instead, the numbers have continued to increase. All of this evidence should have caused a quick dismissal of these cases. But it didn't, and now the court has turned into a circus. The federal and civil litigation will likely take years to sort out.
Autism can be a heartbreaking disorder, often draining parents emotionally and financially...
It would be nice if there were someone or something to blame. We could blame the government and use the federal vaccine compensation program to pay for care. Or we could blame vaccine makers, and get them to pay in civil court. But if vaccine makers -- faced with large awards for a problem that wasn't their fault -- make the same decisions they did in the early 1980s, all American children will suffer, including those with autism. Then, we'll have only ourselves to blame.
Dr. Paul A. Offit, MD, is the chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; he is the co-inventor of the rotavirus vaccine currently licensed in the United States, and the author of Vaccinated: One Man's Quest to Defeat the World's Deadliest Diseases: I have no direct or indirect, personal, financial, or professional connection to him. Likewise, I do not have a conflict of interest, personal, financial, professional, upstream or downstream connection to any pharmeceutical company.
Image information: 1. Mass Vaccination Ouch!, 2. Double ouch, double vaccination, 3. Polio outbreak campaign, 4. 065 Norwich Historic Plaque (Green)
Created with fd's Flickr Toys Mosaic.
Labels: autism, Autism Ominibus, hepatitis B, Hilleman, immunization, mercury, MMR, Offit, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccines



15 Comments:
So much for the "I will do with my kids what I want, it doesn't hurt you" thing anti-vaxers always say.
Exactly, Ami. I wish that some really smart statistician and epidemiologist would get together with a Public Health team and work out what the likely mortality and morbidity rate would be if we were to lose vaccination as a plank of our healthcare systems.
It's amazing - some people accuse Big Pharma of wanting to invent illnesses and medicate us for diseases/conditions that don't really exist. Well - lose the vaccination programme and Big Pharma will have a whole new pool of people with damaged hearts, chronic infections etc.
Regards - Shinga
First, the latest study that shows autism is increasing has looked at children that were 8 yrs old in 2002.
The CDC's report tracks the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder cases in 407,578 children in 14 U.S. communities who were 8 years old in 2002.
That means these children WOULD have received thimerosal in their vaccines given between 1994- 1997.
Secondly, Pharmaceutical companies are making more $ now than at any time in history. It is highly unlikely that the vaccine program will be lost, the Bush administration has enacted laws to prevent this.
Not only is thimerosal a known neurotoxin, it can also disrupt typical immune function.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060322183922.htm
I will explain why typical immune function is important in vaccinating with live virus vaccines, such as the MMR, Varivax, and Flumist further in this post.
The only studies discrediting the vaccine autism link I have read have been epidemiologic, and I hope you are intelligent enough to know that we can manipulate numbers in these studies. There have been NO clinical scientific based studies that prove live virus vaccines do not cause autism.
I would like to share a story about a similar conflict in our recent history. Another time when the medical community relied on epidemiologic studies.
There were many epidemiologists, including prominent statisticians Joseph Berkson and Sir Ronald Fisher (often considered the "father of modern epidemiology") who stood firm in their view that the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was simply a coincidence. Many scientists had blamed the increase in lung cancer on air pollution. For many years, the medical community relied on Sir Ronald Fisher's epidemiologic studies (such as current studies dismissing the link between vaccines and autism), and not clinical research (such as Wakefield's, or Bradstreet's studies on autism) in stating that smoking did not cause lung cancer.
http://tobacco.neu.edu/box/BOEKENBox/Boeken%20Trial%20T...mererDirectCross.PDF
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=%22...ld+Fisher%22+tobacco
A few scientific studies, looking for a relationship between smoking and lung cancer, had been carried out before the Second World War, and indeed had found some evidence of such a relationship, but generally their results were not particularly persuasive and had very little impact on the medical establishment or on public opinion.
It seems as though history is repeating itself.
So if you believe the epidemiologic studies that smoking does not cause cancer, I suppose my argument is lost on you.
Here is a clinical scientific study that proves there is a link between the measles and autism-
http://www.jpands.org/vol9no2/bradstreet.pdf
Can you explain to me how the vaccine strain measles virus ended up in the cerebral spinal fluid of these autistic children, yet was not found in any typically developing controls? Can you find a similar study on the csf of autistic children that does NOT replicate these findings?
The measles virus is an extremely nasty bug- and can cause severe neurologic damage. Take a look at SSPE (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis), or MIBE (measles inclusion body encephalitis). Here you will find studies that show what the mealses virus can do to a compromised immune system.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=104418
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&as_...22autism%22+MET+gene
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/subacute_panencephal..._panencephalitis.htm
I find it interesting that the Mayo clinic associates Childhood Disintegrative Disorder (one of the many conditions under the umbrella of autistic spectrum disorders) with SSPE.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/childhood-disintegrati..r/DS00801/DSECTION=3
Why don't all children who receive the MMR develop regressive autism? Because they don't all have the same immune response. Vaccines were created largely in anticipation of one typical immune response. With amazing HIV research in the past 2 decades, we now know that there are over 100 immune responses.
Do some research on Primary Immune Deficiency, or Primary Immunodeficiency, and learn how horribly underdiagnosed this condition truly is. It is also fact that individuals with immune deficiency are contraindicated for live virus vaccine administration.
The latest scientific genetic studies (MET gene variant) show that children with autism are likely to have ATYPICAL IMMUNE FUNCTION.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&as_...22autism%22+MET+gene
Sadly, the children that have adverse reactions to live virus vaccines, are also likely to have serious sequela to vaccine preventable diseases, such as SSPE or MIBE, and even death, so herd immunity is still very critical to protect these individuals. It is quite a double edge sword.
Regressive autism shares the same symptoms as encephalopathy.
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/encephalopathy/encephalopathy.htm
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/autism/detail_autism.htm
In the US, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program does pay out to autistic children injured by the MMR, if the virus is found in the CSF, although- parents and doctors are instructed to use the diagnosis of "encephalopathy", as the NVICP refuses to pay out for a diagnosis of autism. I have spoke with 2 parents who have gained compensation in this manner.
Check out what the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the US will cover-
http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/table.htm#7
As a parent of a child who had undiagnosed immune deficiency before vaccination with the MMR/Varivax, a child who now has regressive autism, empty sella syndrome, and GI dysfunction that did not appear before a reaction to the MMR/ Varivax combination- I can assure this is a topic I have spent thousands of hours researching.
My daughter had seizures, fever and rash 2 wks after the mmr, and then severely regressed within 2 wks of the reaction. We have since learned that she has an immune deficiency, and the virus over replicated. She also has pituitary damage that can only have been caused by an infection of the csf. Now her docs say no more live virus vaccines- EVER.
Even the CDC states in their own vaccine information statement for the MMR and chickenpox vaccines;
"Some people should check with their doctor about whether they should get MMR / chickenpoxvaccine, including anyone who:
- Has HIV/AIDS, or another disease that affects the immune system"
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-mmr.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-varicella.pdf
This is what the NIH has to say about injecting live viruses into the immune compromised
"Children with Primary Immunodeficiency diseases should not receive live virus vaccines, such as the oral polio, measles, and chicken pox (varicella) vaccines. It is not even safe to give live virus vaccines to children suspected of immunodeficiency until a definitive diagnosis is rendered. There is a risk that such vaccines could cause serious illness or even death."
http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/primary_immuno.cfm#ImportantPrecautions
here is some more scientific evidence, not numbers, for you to chew on
Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism
http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktio...7&filename=65007.pdf
The autism research monographs of Teresa Binstock goes into great detail explaining the effects of live virus vaccines on a dysfunctional immune system , and how it contributes to autism.
http://members.jorsm.com/~binstock/index.htm
Here you will find 38 references to SCIENTIFIC STUDIES that support Wakefield's theory
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/thrower45.html
Status of Serological and Molecular Virological Findings Implicating Measles Virus in the Etiology of Autism
http://www.icdrc.org/status.html
http://www1.wfubmc.edu/News/NewsARticle.htm?ArticleID=1856
And this, this is just the tip of the iceburg of information implicating live virus vaccination in the etiology of autism.
Medicine, as all science, is continually evolving. To think we have all the answers now is incredulous. Should we eliminate the vaccine- by all means, NO. We should follow suit with recent changes in the administration of the polio vaccine. Many are surprised to learn that the only cases of polio on the US over the last 20 yrs were caused by the OPV- oral polio vaccine, which is a live virus vaccine. That is why the US government began using IPV, an inactivated polio virus vaccine in 2001. Children with immune deficiencies contracted VDPV, or vaccine derived polio virus from virus replication of the OPV, and are now crippled for life.
The only evidence disproving a link between the MMR and autism is the Cochrane report. The summary reads beautifully-
"Measles, mumps and rubella are three very dangerous infectious diseases which cause a heavy disease, disability and death burden in the developing world. Researchers from the Cochrane Vaccines Field reviewed 139 studies conducted to assess the effects of the live attenuated combined vaccine to prevent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) in children. MMR protects children against infections of the upper airways but very rarely may cause a benign form of bleeding under the skin and milder forms of measles, mumps and rubella. No credible evidence of an involvement of MMR with either autism or Crohn's disease was found. No field studies of the vaccine's effectiveness were found but the impact of mass immunisation on the elimination of the diseases has been demonstrated worldwide."
But, any educated person can choose to read further into the Author's Conclusion in the abstract-
"The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate. The evidence of adverse events following immunisation with MMR cannot be separated from its role in preventing the target diseases."
http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004407.html
Largely inadequate, as is the state of today's "one size fits all" healthcare system.
An inactivated measles vaccine HAS been created. It is time we start using it.
Monica, I'm not sure that you read this blog entry or any of my previous ones on the topic of vaccination before undamming your comment?
I'm aware of the development of a new measles vaccine - it is an outstanding scientific achievement. I am apprehensive that this sort of development and exploration is in jeopardy. I'm not assured by your statment that the Bush Administration will prevent this. I believe that Dr. Offit is raising some valid concerns.
I'm touched by your concern for my intelligence - truly.
You might wish to update your research and look outside the National Inquirer style of resources that is JPandS and Med. Hypotheses. Kevin Leitch, Autism Street, Autism Diva and Orac are all excellent resources on autism research and it would be wrong of me to effect that I might improve on their commentaries.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01425.x - Yokohama study, Japan, which found that autism rates continued to increase despite withdrawal of the MMR vaccine:
No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study
Authors: Honda, Hideo1; Shimizu, Yasuo1; Rutter, Michael2
Source: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, Volume 46, Number 6, June 2005 , pp. 572-579(8)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Abstract:
Background:
A causal relationship between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and occurrence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has been claimed, based on an increase in ASD in the USA and the UK after introduction of the MMR vaccine. However, the possibility that this increase is coincidental has not been eliminated. The unique circumstances of a Japanese MMR vaccination program provide an opportunity for comparison of ASD incidence before and after termination of the program. Methods:
This study examined cumulative incidence of ASD up to age seven for children born from 1988 to 1996 in Kohoku Ward (population approximately 300,000), Yokohama, Japan. ASD cases included all cases of pervasive developmental disorders according to ICD-10 guidelines. Results:
The MMR vaccination rate in the city of Yokohama declined significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1992, and not a single vaccination was administered in 1993 or thereafter. In contrast, cumulative incidence of ASD up to age seven increased significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1996 and most notably rose dramatically beginning with the birth cohort of 1993. Conclusions:
The significance of this finding is that MMR vaccination is most unlikely to be a main cause of ASD, that it cannot explain the rise over time in the incidence of ASD, and that withdrawal of MMR in countries where it is still being used cannot be expected to lead to a reduction in the incidence of ASD.
Btw, Shinga, the development of the inactivated measles vaccine occured in the late 60's. Nothing new, it just wasn't effective then, as measles was still endemic. Take a look at the end game strategy for worldwide polio eradication. In countries where polio is still prevalent, the OPV is still in use, as it is more effective. Once a disease has been nearly eradicated from a region, it is then feasable to use an inactivated virus.
It is time we use an inactivated measles virus.
Good, I am glad you are more familiar with this debate than the average NT. Perhaps you may understand a bit more.
I am familiar with AutismDiva, Leitch and the rest.
Any live virus vaccine, given to a child with undiagnosed immune deficiency is unsafe, as they cannot mount the expected immune response to the vaccine, allowing the vaccine virus to replicate and cause the illness in the child.
I will not allow your comments to trivialize the damage cookie cutter medicine has done to my daughter.
The MMR may not (and I doubt it is) the only "cause" of autism.
Perhaps some children who were born "different" and on the higher end of the spectrum, with immune deficiency (as many on the spectrum have) suffer regression and very real physical damage from live viruses.
Perhaps these children would all go on to later be diagnosed with an ASD, yet they have a "manifestation of symptoms" after a live virus infection, causing the parents to assume the vaccine caused the autism. Maybe something happens that makes the autism more severe?
Each time my daughter gets sick, I do see very real changes in her personality.
Unfortunately, in addition to regression, my daughter had pituitary damage from this event, and has practically stopped growing. (she has only grown 1 inch in the 2 yrs since this event, from a steady growth at the 25th percentile, to off the chart within 6 months of the reaction)
I do not rely on epidemiologic studies, as numbers can be manipulated.
I am truly thankful that the oral polio vaccine had been changed to an inactivated virus vaccine before Jade had her vaccines. If not, today she may very well be suffering from VDPV.
Is it so far fetched to believe that just as genetically we are not neurotypical, we are not immuno-typical, either?
Studies are now linking strep throat to the onset of OCD. Is it hard to imagine that a child with an ASD can suffer from neurological sequela after a measles or varicella infection?
However, had she caught the measles naturally, she may have developed SSPE.
I am the first to be fearful of a collapse in our vaccination program, as neither myself, nor my daughter have antibodies to measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, diptheria, tetanus, or pertussis. We don't know about the rest, as we haven't been tested for them, but I imagine that it is the same.
With the way our immune system responds, one of these diseases could literally kill us.
Myself and my daughter have both been failed by our medical system, and I am very bitter about this.
I had undiagnosed immune deficiency for 12 yrs, hospitalized 24 times for various infections in that time. Not once did a doctor refer me to immunology. Had they diagnosed me sooner, I would have known my daughter should not have had certain vaccines. I had to learn of immune deficiency myself, in researching why she had the reaction. Once I asked for an immunology referral, they discovered my immune function is awry. Doctors spent 12 yrs treating my symptoms with medication that caused more symptoms, without once looking for the underlying cause.
Aside from the autism debate- we need to make drastic changes in our immunization program, to protect children with immune deficiencies, and others at risk for adverse reactions.
I was disgusted when my daughter developed facial tics, and repeated chest patting 3 days after her last DTaP. When I looked up the package insert to the vaccine, it states "Infants and children with recognized possible or potential underlying neurologic conditions seem to be at enhanced risk for the appearance of manifestations of the underlying neurologic disorder within 2 or 3 days following whole-cell pertussis DTP vaccine immunization"
And if you look at the safety studies for the new acellular pertussis, you will find it is not much safer at all.
My daughter was already awaiting an eval with a dev pediatrician for autism when she was given this. I called Aventis, they said autism is contraindicated, I called the CDC, they said it isn't.
WTF? Who calls the shots? (no pun intended)
All vaccines are not safe for all, yet they are given to all, regardless. It really makes me sick.
When are we going to start demanding personalized healthcare for those on the spectrum, and those with immune deficiencies?
Monica - I gather that you are convinced that it is appropriate to reprove me for holding different opinions - fair enough.
Scanning through your latest splurge, I catch the usual 'disgust', 'sick', accusations of trivialising etc. I also gather that you may have read through some of the research but that you choose to reject in on the grounds that it was probably manipulated although you feel the probity of the references that you promote?
By the by - have we met that you make such confident assertions about others NT status etc.? Or is this another example of something that you feel that you know?
Regards - Shinga
That was certainly an interesting paper, Claire. Particularly if it is interpreted in the light of subsequent studies and reports with similar findings.
Regards - Shinga
I do not pretend to know your neuro status, just assuming that if you are familiar with AutismDiva and Leitch, you are far more informed than the average nt.
You may hold your own opinion on what happenned to my daughter.
Unfortunately, is is not just my opinion that my daughter was vaccine injured. It is also now the opinion of her team of doctors.
And yes, I am disgusted, by many things. Including the day my daughter had a reaction, the ER doctor assured me a reaction would only occur within 5 days. (I have since learned this is not true) I am infuriated that they did not do any testing that day. I am angry that they could have given her antivirals that would have counteracted the permanent pituitary damage she now has.
I am sad that doctors have suggested growth hormones.
I am downright pissed that doctors are incredulous to the fact that a vaccine reaction can happen, and did not consider it, although I mentioned the vaccines that day.
I am also angry that I have had to uncover the truth myself, and ask for referrals, that have uncovered her immune deficiency.
I am absolutely horrified that her doctors have encouraged a lumbar puncture now. As is she has not suffered enough. I doubt it would help now, anyway.
When Jade's GI problems were so severe that she was screaming all day from gas pains, and pooping out whole spaghetti noodles, all her doctor told me was "be more positive" as if my autistic daughter's medical care was not important.
I would love to see a study on the medical treatment of those with autism.
If people read the literature on the connection between autism and autoimmune disorders we could learn something about why there is such a negative reaction to vaccinations. One of the main risk factors for having a child with sporadic autism, along with the age of the father and the age of the mother's father at her birth, is a family history of type 1 diabetes, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders. There should be caution giving any baby who has always been extremely fussy and unhappy vaccinations, exspecially a child of an older father 33+, or a mother who had an older father or either parent with autoimmunes. Any baby with a family history of autism or schizophrenia should not be vaccinated and should be evaluated. http://autism-prevention.blogspot.com/
A post about vaccines and autism would not be complete without reference to Brian Deer.
http://www.briandeer.com/
He shows that the only "evidence" that MMR causes autism is a put-up by Wakefield. The Lancet retracted the paper. The "data" was misrepresented from the start.
Children of older fathers, children of mothers who had older fathers when they born, children born to a family with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, Crohn's, Hashimoto's,and other autoimmune disorders and children with family histories of autism, schizophrenia,OCD, Asperger's should not be vaccinated in the normal way. These children are prone to autism and it is the antigens in the vaccine that are the causes of their poor outcomes. The causes of autism need to be known by everyone and not kept from the public by those who pubicize a new diet pill at the tip of a hat.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
As a smoker if you do not care about yourself its fine but what about your family? The environmental cigarette smoke can lead to passive smoking which may result in risk of lung cancer, heart disease, miscarriages and birth defects, developing asthma in children and adults, ear infections, aggravated asthma, allergies, and other conditions like learning difficulty in children and lung infection. http://www.chantixhome.com/
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home